✍️
✍️Technical Writing

Docs as Code in 2025: The Complete Guide to Modern Documentation

Treat your documentation like software: version control, CI/CD, automated testing, and pull requests. Here's how the best teams are doing it.

By Taresh SharanDecember 27, 202511 min read

Your documentation is broken.

It lives in a wiki no one updates. It's out of sync with the code. Half the pages are from 2019. The search doesn't work. New developers spend their first week just finding the right docs.

Sound familiar?

The solution isn't a new tool or a documentation rewrite. It's a philosophy shift: treat your docs exactly like you treat your code.

Welcome to Docs as Code.

📖 What Is Docs as Code?

Docs as Code is a methodology where documentation is:

PrincipleTraditional DocsDocs as Code
StorageWiki, SharePoint, Google DocsGit repository
FormatRich text, WYSIWYGMarkdown, AsciiDoc, reStructuredText
WorkflowEdit in placeBranch → Write → Review → Merge
ReviewAd hoc or nonePull request with required approval
PublishingManual copy/pasteAutomated CI/CD pipeline
TestingNoneLink checks, spelling, linting
Versioning"Final_v3_REAL.docx"Git branches, tags, releases

🚀 Why Docs as Code Works

BenefitHow It Helps
Version controlSee who changed what, when, and why
Single source of truthCode and docs in same repo = always in sync
Developer-friendlyWriters and devs use same tools
ReviewablePRs catch errors before publishing
TestableAutomated checks prevent broken links
ScalableSame workflow for 10 or 10,000 pages
CollaborativeMultiple contributors without conflicts

🛠️ The Modern Docs as Code Stack (2025)

Source Format

FormatBest ForTools
MarkdownMost documentation, simple and universalAny text editor
MDXInteractive docs with React componentsNext.js, Docusaurus
AsciiDocComplex technical docs, booksAntora, Asciidoctor
reStructuredTextPython ecosystemSphinx, Read the Docs

Static Site Generators

ToolLanguageBest ForNotable Users
DocusaurusReactDeveloper docs, versioningMeta, Supabase
MkDocsPythonSimple, clean docsFastAPI, Kubernetes
NextraNext.jsNext.js projects, MDXVercel, SWR
GitBookSaaSNon-technical teamsMany startups
Astro StarlightAstroPerformance-first docsAstro, Cloudflare
SphinxPythonAPI docs, Python projectsPython, Read the Docs

Hosting Platforms

PlatformFree TierBest For
VercelGenerousNext.js/React sites
NetlifyGenerousAny static site
GitHub PagesUnlimited publicOpen source projects
Cloudflare PagesGenerousGlobal performance
Read the DocsOpen source freePython/Sphinx projects

📁 Repository Structure

`` docs/ ├── README.md # Docs contribution guide ├── docs/ # All documentation content │ ├── getting-started/ │ │ ├── installation.md │ │ ├── quickstart.md │ │ └── configuration.md │ ├── guides/ │ │ ├── authentication.md │ │ └── deployment.md │ ├── api-reference/ │ │ ├── endpoints.md │ │ └── errors.md │ └── contributing.md ├── static/ # Images, downloads │ └── images/ ├── docusaurus.config.js # Site configuration ├── sidebars.js # Navigation structure └── package.json # Dependencies ``

🔄 The Docs as Code Workflow

Step-by-Step Process

StepActionTools
1. BranchCreate feature branchgit checkout -b docs/new-guide
2. WriteAuthor in MarkdownVS Code, any editor
3. PreviewLocal development servernpm run start
4. CommitSave changes with messagegit commit -m "Add auth guide"
5. PushUpload to remotegit push origin docs/new-guide
6. PROpen pull requestGitHub/GitLab UI
7. ReviewGet feedback, iteratePR comments
8. MergeApprove and mergeSquash merge recommended
9. DeployAutomatic via CI/CDGitHub Actions, Vercel

PR Review Checklist

CheckWhat to Look For
AccuracyIs the technical content correct?
ClarityCan a new user understand this?
CompletenessAre all steps included?
StyleDoes it match the style guide?
LinksDo all links work?
ImagesAre screenshots current and clear?
Code samplesDo they run? Are they correct?

🧪 Automated Testing for Docs

Essential Checks

Test TypeWhat It CatchesTool
Link checkingBroken internal/external linkslinkinator, markdown-link-check
SpellingTypos, inconsistenciescspell, aspell
LintingMarkdown formatting issuesmarkdownlint, remark
Style guideVoice, terminologyvale, alex
Code validationBroken code samplesCustom scripts
BuildSite compiles successfullyCI pipeline

Sample GitHub Actions Workflow

```yaml name: Docs CI on: pull_request: paths: - 'docs/**' - '*.md'

jobs: lint: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Lint Markdown uses: DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2-action@v14 - name: Check spelling uses: streetsidesoftware/cspell-action@v5 - name: Check links uses: lycheeverse/lychee-action@v1

build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 - run: npm ci - run: npm run build ```

📝 Writing Standards for Docs as Code

File Naming Conventions

PatternExampleUse For
kebab-case.mdgetting-started.mdAll documentation files
README.mdREADME.mdDirectory overview
index.mdindex.mdSection landing pages
_category_.json_category_.jsonDocusaurus folder config

Frontmatter Standards

``markdown --- title: Getting Started with Authentication description: Learn how to implement OAuth2 authentication sidebar_position: 1 tags: [auth, oauth, security] --- ``

Content Structure

ElementPurposeExample
Title (H1)Page topic (from frontmatter)# Authentication
Intro paragraphWhat and why"This guide covers..."
PrerequisitesWhat readers needNode.js 18+, API key
Steps (H2)Main sections## Step 1: Install
Subsections (H3)Details within steps### Configure options
Code blocksExamples``js ... ``
AdmonitionsWarnings, tips:::warning

🎯 Docs as Code Best Practices

Do's

PracticeWhy It Matters
Keep docs in same repo as codeSync guaranteed
Require PR reviewsQuality control
Automate deploymentNo manual publishing
Test on every PRCatch issues early
Use templatesConsistency
Version your docsMatch software versions
Add searchDiscoverability

Don'ts

Anti-patternWhy It's Bad
Docs in separate repoDrift from code
Direct commits to mainNo review process
Manual publishingError-prone, bottleneck
No testingBroken links everywhere
Inconsistent styleConfusing for readers
Outdated screenshotsMisleading
Missing code samplesLess useful

📊 Measuring Documentation Success

MetricHow to MeasureTarget
Time to first successUser testing<15 minutes
Support tickets about docsTicket analysisDecreasing trend
Docs contributionsPR countIncreasing trend
Search success rateAnalytics>80%
Page views to completionScroll depth>70% reach end
FreshnessLast updated date<6 months
Broken link countAutomated scans0

🚀 Migration Path: Wiki to Docs as Code

PhaseActionsTimeline
1. AuditInventory existing docs, identify gapsWeek 1-2
2. Choose stackSelect tools, set up repoWeek 2-3
3. Migrate high-valueConvert most-used docs firstWeek 3-6
4. AutomateCI/CD, testing, deploymentWeek 4-5
5. RedirectPoint old wiki to new docsWeek 6
6. TrainOnboard team to new workflowWeek 6-8
7. IterateContinuous improvementOngoing

💡 The Bottom Line

Old WayDocs as Code Way
Docs rot in wikisDocs evolve with code
"Who owns the docs?"Everyone contributes
Publishing is a bottleneckAutomated and instant
No one reviews docsPRs require approval
Broken links everywhereAutomated link checks
Out of date constantlyVersioned with releases

🎯 Getting Started Today

Week 1: Foundation 1. Choose a static site generator (Docusaurus recommended) 2. Create docs folder in your main repo 3. Migrate 3-5 high-value pages to Markdown 4. Set up local preview

Week 2: Workflow 1. Create PR template for docs 2. Set up basic CI (build check, link check) 3. Deploy to Vercel/Netlify 4. Write contribution guide

Week 3: Scale 1. Add search (Algolia, Pagefind) 2. Implement style linting (Vale) 3. Create templates for common doc types 4. Train team on workflow

---

Documentation isn't a side project. It's a product.

And like any product, it deserves proper engineering practices: version control, testing, review, and continuous deployment.

Docs as Code isn't just a workflow—it's a commitment to treating your documentation with the same care as your codebase.

Your docs are read 100x more than your code. Isn't it time they got the same attention?

---

Ready to make the switch? Start small: one repo, one folder, one page. The hardest part is beginning.

Tags

Technical WritingDocs as CodeDocumentationDevOpsGitMarkdown
Docs as Code in 2025: The Complete Guide to Modern Documentation | Sharan Initiatives