Your documentation is broken.
It lives in a wiki no one updates. It's out of sync with the code. Half the pages are from 2019. The search doesn't work. New developers spend their first week just finding the right docs.
Sound familiar?
The solution isn't a new tool or a documentation rewrite. It's a philosophy shift: treat your docs exactly like you treat your code.
Welcome to Docs as Code.
📖 What Is Docs as Code?
Docs as Code is a methodology where documentation is:
| Principle | Traditional Docs | Docs as Code |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | Wiki, SharePoint, Google Docs | Git repository |
| Format | Rich text, WYSIWYG | Markdown, AsciiDoc, reStructuredText |
| Workflow | Edit in place | Branch → Write → Review → Merge |
| Review | Ad hoc or none | Pull request with required approval |
| Publishing | Manual copy/paste | Automated CI/CD pipeline |
| Testing | None | Link checks, spelling, linting |
| Versioning | "Final_v3_REAL.docx" | Git branches, tags, releases |
🚀 Why Docs as Code Works
| Benefit | How It Helps |
|---|---|
| Version control | See who changed what, when, and why |
| Single source of truth | Code and docs in same repo = always in sync |
| Developer-friendly | Writers and devs use same tools |
| Reviewable | PRs catch errors before publishing |
| Testable | Automated checks prevent broken links |
| Scalable | Same workflow for 10 or 10,000 pages |
| Collaborative | Multiple contributors without conflicts |
🛠️ The Modern Docs as Code Stack (2025)
Source Format
| Format | Best For | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Markdown | Most documentation, simple and universal | Any text editor |
| MDX | Interactive docs with React components | Next.js, Docusaurus |
| AsciiDoc | Complex technical docs, books | Antora, Asciidoctor |
| reStructuredText | Python ecosystem | Sphinx, Read the Docs |
Static Site Generators
| Tool | Language | Best For | Notable Users |
|---|---|---|---|
| Docusaurus | React | Developer docs, versioning | Meta, Supabase |
| MkDocs | Python | Simple, clean docs | FastAPI, Kubernetes |
| Nextra | Next.js | Next.js projects, MDX | Vercel, SWR |
| GitBook | SaaS | Non-technical teams | Many startups |
| Astro Starlight | Astro | Performance-first docs | Astro, Cloudflare |
| Sphinx | Python | API docs, Python projects | Python, Read the Docs |
Hosting Platforms
| Platform | Free Tier | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Vercel | Generous | Next.js/React sites |
| Netlify | Generous | Any static site |
| GitHub Pages | Unlimited public | Open source projects |
| Cloudflare Pages | Generous | Global performance |
| Read the Docs | Open source free | Python/Sphinx projects |
📁 Repository Structure
``
docs/
├── README.md # Docs contribution guide
├── docs/ # All documentation content
│ ├── getting-started/
│ │ ├── installation.md
│ │ ├── quickstart.md
│ │ └── configuration.md
│ ├── guides/
│ │ ├── authentication.md
│ │ └── deployment.md
│ ├── api-reference/
│ │ ├── endpoints.md
│ │ └── errors.md
│ └── contributing.md
├── static/ # Images, downloads
│ └── images/
├── docusaurus.config.js # Site configuration
├── sidebars.js # Navigation structure
└── package.json # Dependencies
``
🔄 The Docs as Code Workflow
Step-by-Step Process
| Step | Action | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Branch | Create feature branch | git checkout -b docs/new-guide |
| 2. Write | Author in Markdown | VS Code, any editor |
| 3. Preview | Local development server | npm run start |
| 4. Commit | Save changes with message | git commit -m "Add auth guide" |
| 5. Push | Upload to remote | git push origin docs/new-guide |
| 6. PR | Open pull request | GitHub/GitLab UI |
| 7. Review | Get feedback, iterate | PR comments |
| 8. Merge | Approve and merge | Squash merge recommended |
| 9. Deploy | Automatic via CI/CD | GitHub Actions, Vercel |
PR Review Checklist
| Check | What to Look For |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | Is the technical content correct? |
| Clarity | Can a new user understand this? |
| Completeness | Are all steps included? |
| Style | Does it match the style guide? |
| Links | Do all links work? |
| Images | Are screenshots current and clear? |
| Code samples | Do they run? Are they correct? |
🧪 Automated Testing for Docs
Essential Checks
| Test Type | What It Catches | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Link checking | Broken internal/external links | linkinator, markdown-link-check |
| Spelling | Typos, inconsistencies | cspell, aspell |
| Linting | Markdown formatting issues | markdownlint, remark |
| Style guide | Voice, terminology | vale, alex |
| Code validation | Broken code samples | Custom scripts |
| Build | Site compiles successfully | CI pipeline |
Sample GitHub Actions Workflow
```yaml name: Docs CI on: pull_request: paths: - 'docs/**' - '*.md'
jobs: lint: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Lint Markdown uses: DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2-action@v14 - name: Check spelling uses: streetsidesoftware/cspell-action@v5 - name: Check links uses: lycheeverse/lychee-action@v1
build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 - run: npm ci - run: npm run build ```
📝 Writing Standards for Docs as Code
File Naming Conventions
| Pattern | Example | Use For |
|---|---|---|
kebab-case.md | getting-started.md | All documentation files |
README.md | README.md | Directory overview |
index.md | index.md | Section landing pages |
_category_.json | _category_.json | Docusaurus folder config |
Frontmatter Standards
``markdown
---
title: Getting Started with Authentication
description: Learn how to implement OAuth2 authentication
sidebar_position: 1
tags: [auth, oauth, security]
---
``
Content Structure
| Element | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Title (H1) | Page topic (from frontmatter) | # Authentication |
| Intro paragraph | What and why | "This guide covers..." |
| Prerequisites | What readers need | Node.js 18+, API key |
| Steps (H2) | Main sections | ## Step 1: Install |
| Subsections (H3) | Details within steps | ### Configure options |
| Code blocks | Examples | ``js ... `` |
| Admonitions | Warnings, tips | :::warning |
🎯 Docs as Code Best Practices
Do's
| Practice | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Keep docs in same repo as code | Sync guaranteed |
| Require PR reviews | Quality control |
| Automate deployment | No manual publishing |
| Test on every PR | Catch issues early |
| Use templates | Consistency |
| Version your docs | Match software versions |
| Add search | Discoverability |
Don'ts
| Anti-pattern | Why It's Bad |
|---|---|
| Docs in separate repo | Drift from code |
| Direct commits to main | No review process |
| Manual publishing | Error-prone, bottleneck |
| No testing | Broken links everywhere |
| Inconsistent style | Confusing for readers |
| Outdated screenshots | Misleading |
| Missing code samples | Less useful |
📊 Measuring Documentation Success
| Metric | How to Measure | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first success | User testing | <15 minutes |
| Support tickets about docs | Ticket analysis | Decreasing trend |
| Docs contributions | PR count | Increasing trend |
| Search success rate | Analytics | >80% |
| Page views to completion | Scroll depth | >70% reach end |
| Freshness | Last updated date | <6 months |
| Broken link count | Automated scans | 0 |
🚀 Migration Path: Wiki to Docs as Code
| Phase | Actions | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Audit | Inventory existing docs, identify gaps | Week 1-2 |
| 2. Choose stack | Select tools, set up repo | Week 2-3 |
| 3. Migrate high-value | Convert most-used docs first | Week 3-6 |
| 4. Automate | CI/CD, testing, deployment | Week 4-5 |
| 5. Redirect | Point old wiki to new docs | Week 6 |
| 6. Train | Onboard team to new workflow | Week 6-8 |
| 7. Iterate | Continuous improvement | Ongoing |
💡 The Bottom Line
| Old Way | Docs as Code Way |
|---|---|
| Docs rot in wikis | Docs evolve with code |
| "Who owns the docs?" | Everyone contributes |
| Publishing is a bottleneck | Automated and instant |
| No one reviews docs | PRs require approval |
| Broken links everywhere | Automated link checks |
| Out of date constantly | Versioned with releases |
🎯 Getting Started Today
Week 1: Foundation 1. Choose a static site generator (Docusaurus recommended) 2. Create docs folder in your main repo 3. Migrate 3-5 high-value pages to Markdown 4. Set up local preview
Week 2: Workflow 1. Create PR template for docs 2. Set up basic CI (build check, link check) 3. Deploy to Vercel/Netlify 4. Write contribution guide
Week 3: Scale 1. Add search (Algolia, Pagefind) 2. Implement style linting (Vale) 3. Create templates for common doc types 4. Train team on workflow
---
Documentation isn't a side project. It's a product.
And like any product, it deserves proper engineering practices: version control, testing, review, and continuous deployment.
Docs as Code isn't just a workflow—it's a commitment to treating your documentation with the same care as your codebase.
Your docs are read 100x more than your code. Isn't it time they got the same attention?
---
Ready to make the switch? Start small: one repo, one folder, one page. The hardest part is beginning.
Tags
Taresh Sharan
support@sharaninitiatives.com